Before you can get your case to court you must serve the defendant with the complaint. This generally is a fairly simple task. But what about the situation where the defendant cannot be found or is hiding. Maryland rule 2-121 deals with serving an individual. You can deliver the complaint by handing it to the defendant, by sending it to him by certified mail, or handing it to somebody that he lives with provided they are mature enough to know the papers are important and will give them to the defendant. Well what if the defendant knows you're trying to serve him and purposely made himself unavailable. Section (B.) deals with the issue of defendants evading service. The court requires an affidavit establishing facts sufficient to prove the defendant is evading service. If the defendant is not evading service however you simply cannot locate him you must first make good-faith efforts to locate the defendant and serve him. Thereafter if you still cannot locate and serve the defendant you should petition the court showing your good-faith efforts to get the defendant served and in that case ask the the court to order other means of service. The court can order any other means that it believes is appropriate under the circumstances and is reasonably calculated to give the actual notice. When you file your motion asking the court to allow you to serve by alternate means it is necessary to outline how the alternate means are calculated to give actual notice.
If you have questions regarding serving your complaint please feel free to give me a call at 1-888-760-7339. I am happy to answer your questions for you over the phone at no cost to you.
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Owner Liability Maryland Personal Injury Lawyer
There are circumstances where the owner of a automobile allows someone else to use that automobile when the owner is not present. The question of the owner's liability arises in the event the driver is in an accident. In Maryland personal injury law there are two presumptions that favor the plaintiff, in some positive ways, in establishing not owner liability but also insurance carrier coverage.
One is the presumption of agency and the other is the presumption that a non-owner operator of a motor vehicle operated with the permission of the owner. see 343 Md 320 (1995). . It is important to know the distinction between agency permissive use. The owner of the vehicle is subject to liability if the driver was acting as his agent when the accident occurred. If the driver of the vehicle was simply using the vehicle with the permission of the owner but was not doing anything for the owner at the time of the accident, then there is no liability to the owner. Specifically, there is no liability for permissive use. As such when it comes to issues of proof at trial in oder to make the owner liable you must establish evidence of the purpose of the use by the driver. To hold the owner liable that use must establish agency between owner and driver. One other issue of significant importance is the effect of permissive use on insurance coverage. If you can establish that the driver was negligent and had permission of the owner to use the vehicle you can still collect against the owner's insurance policy even if there is no agency between driver and owner.
If you have been involved in an automobile accident please feel free to give me a call at 1-888-760-7339. I am happy to discuss your case with you over the phone at no cost to you
One is the presumption of agency and the other is the presumption that a non-owner operator of a motor vehicle operated with the permission of the owner. see 343 Md 320 (1995). . It is important to know the distinction between agency permissive use. The owner of the vehicle is subject to liability if the driver was acting as his agent when the accident occurred. If the driver of the vehicle was simply using the vehicle with the permission of the owner but was not doing anything for the owner at the time of the accident, then there is no liability to the owner. Specifically, there is no liability for permissive use. As such when it comes to issues of proof at trial in oder to make the owner liable you must establish evidence of the purpose of the use by the driver. To hold the owner liable that use must establish agency between owner and driver. One other issue of significant importance is the effect of permissive use on insurance coverage. If you can establish that the driver was negligent and had permission of the owner to use the vehicle you can still collect against the owner's insurance policy even if there is no agency between driver and owner.
If you have been involved in an automobile accident please feel free to give me a call at 1-888-760-7339. I am happy to discuss your case with you over the phone at no cost to you
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)